[debate-l] Accepted Papers to Koper Conference
Alfred Snider
alfred.snider at uvm.edu
Mon Sep 25 09:27:47 CDT 2006
On behalf of the organizers of the conference THINKING AND SPEAKING A
BETTER WORD - ARGUMENTATION, RHETORIC, DEBATE AND THE PEDAGOGY OF
EMPOWERMENT to be held at the University of Primorska November 24-26
2006, I am pleased to announce our list of accepted papers.
The Faculty of Humanities at the University of Primorska and the
Educational Research Institute , Slovenia, the World Debate Institute at
the University of Vermont USA, the National Education Institute of the
Republic of Slovenia and ZIP, Za in proti, zavod za kulturo dialoga/ Pro
et contra Institute for culture of dialogue Slovenia invite all scholars
of argumentation, rhetoric, debate, and educators using deliberative
education methodologies to attend.
Please join us at the conference in Koper, Slovenia, a beautiful old
Adriatic coastal town not far from Venice, Italy (best airport). We can
assist you in making easy travel connections from Venice to Koper. There
will be a reception, coffee breaks and a banquet. We have reserved space
in the lovely Koper Museum & Garden as well as at the University of
Primorska. We have a choice of excellent housing from dormitories to
four star hotels all at very affordable rates. The conference fee is 55
Euros.
Further information can be found at http://debate.uvm.edu/betterworld.htm
The application form can be found at
http://debate.uvm.edu/Applicationform.doc
ACCEPTED PAPERS as of 25-09-2006
Three sections: Argumentation, Pedagogy of Empowerment and Debate
Authors are invited to make adjustments. Please email them to
Alfred.snider at uvm.edu
ARGUMENTATION SECTION
Papers:
Keynote: Peter Houtlosser (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands):
title to be announced
Jan Albert Van Laar (Rijks University Groeningen, The Netherlands): The
consequences of advancing a standpoint
Henrik Bohlin (Södertörns högskola, Sweden): Paradox of Critical Thinking
Eithan Orkibi (Tel Aviv University, Israel): The Ethos of responsibility
in student discourse on better society. The case of the French student
movement during the Algerian War
Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (Universiteit of Amsterdam, The Netherlands):
Manoeuvring strategically with metonym in the confrontation and
argumentation stages of a discussion
Emmanuelle Danblon (Free University of Brussels, Belgium) and Galia
Yanoshevsky (Tel Aviv University), The Educational Force of the
Universal Audience
Bilal Amjarso (University of Amsterdam), Addressing anticipated
countermoves as a form of strategic manoeuvring
Barbara Domajnko and Majda Pahor (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia),
Argumentation for Health
Hedvika Dermol Hvala (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia), O retorisni
nenadarjenosti Slovencev
Anders Ullholm (Södertörns högskola, Sweden), Unprincipled Critical
Thinking
Maria Wolrath Söderberg (Södertörns högskola), Topical learning
Emmanuel de Jonge (Free University of Brussels, Belgium),
Disenchantment, resentment and inaction : a new form of revolutionary
ideal? The rhetoric and argumentation of altermondialist discourses
Mojca Brezar (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia), The connection between
topoi and connectives in French political debates
Corina Andone (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands), The Strategy
of Pointing Out an Inconsistency: Some Variants
Assimakis Tseronis (University of Leiden, The Netherlands),
Qualification of a standpoint as a means to manage the burden of proof:
the case of frankly and in fact
Miskovic-Lukovic (University of Kragujevac, Serbia), Constructing a
national identity: The politics of representation in the Serbian public
discourse
Leah E. Polcar (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Using
questions and answers in a critical discussion: The reconstruction of
question-answer discourse
Lilian Bermejo Luque (University of Murcia, Spain), The Ad Baculum as a
fallacy. False vs. bad argumentation
Karmen Sterk (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia), Argumentation between
science and madness
Dima Mohammed (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Public debate
as an argumentative activity type: a pragma-dialectical perspective
Yvon Tonnard (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands), How to identify
strategic manoeuvring: the case of ignoring a standpoint
Pavel Koltaj (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia), Transcribing
children's argumentation
Janja Zmavc (Educational Research Institute & University of Primorska,
Slovenia), Ethos and pathos in Anaximenes' Rhetorica ad Alexandrum
Henrike Jansen (University of Leiden, The Netherlands), Argument form
and rhetorical effectiveness. Reductio ad absurdum as a presentational
device
Georgios Papagounos and Manolis Polychronides (University of Athens,
Greece), Teaching argumentation to health care professionals.
Theodora Achourioti (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands), In
defense of normative theories of argumentation
Diana-Elena Popa (University of Galati, Romania), The Discourse of
Culture in the Romanian Public Sphere
Anca Gata (University of Galati, Romania), Political Police in the
Romanian Public Sphere: Contemporary Controversies and Representations
Ruth Amossy (Tel Aviv University, Israel), Constructing an ethos of war
witness and responsible citizen in WWI: Ethos reconsidered
David Cratis Williams (Florida Atlantic University, USA),
“Argumentatively Competent Citizens: Building Blocks of Democracy”
Matjaz Babic (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia), Rhetoric and
manipulation. Roman rhetoric on the goals of oratory
Panel
Soderberg, Ullholm, Bohlin, Burman (Södertörns högskola, Sweden):
Critical Thinking for a Pluralistic University
PEDAGOGY OF EMPOWERMENT SECTION
KEYNOTE: DEBATE AS AN ACTIVE METHOD FOR MODERN CLASSROOMS
Alfred C. Snider, Universty of Vermont, USA, Alfred.snider at uvm.edu
METACOGNITION AND CRITICAL THINKING
Mag Tanja Rupnik Vec, Institute of Education Ljubljana, Slovenia,
tanja.vec at zrss.si
THREE LEVELS OF ASSURING COMPLEX AND CRITICAL THINKING
Dr Zora Rutar – Ilc, Institute of Education Ljubljana, Slovenia,
zora.rutar at zrss.si
CRITICAL THINKING AND LANGUAGE SKILLS AS COMPONENTS OF EMPLOYABILITY OF
MALAYSIAN COMPUTER SCIENCE GRADUATES
Norshima Zainal Shah - Dublin City University
DE BONO'S LESSONS FOR IMPROVING THINKING EFFECTIVENESS IN THE CONTEXT OF
SLOVENIA'S SCHOOLS
Tamara Malesevic, Primary school Smarje pri Jelsah, Slovenia,
tamara.malesevic at guest.arnes.si
FROM THE STORY TO THE CONVERSATION AND FROM THE CHILDREN’S PHILOSOPHY TO
CRITICAL THINKING
Lidija Sket, Primary school Smarje pri JelSah, Slovenia,
lidija.sket at guest.arnes.si
DEBATE IN THE HIGH SCHOOL PHILOSOPHY CLASSROOM, Gorazd Jurman, Gimnazija
Ledina, jurman at yahoo.com
PHILOSOPHY FOR THE CHILDREN IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS – ENCOURAGING CRITICAL
THINKING
Anita Mirjanic, Primary school Gradec, Slovenia,
anita.mirjanic at slo-kabel.si
DEBATE AS A BRIDGE TO THE OTHER: EMOTIONAL AND UTILITARIAN ELEMENTS OF
PEDAGOGICAL PROCESS
Mag: Daniela Kozlovic, Gimnazija Piran, Slovenia,
Daniela.kozlovic at guest.arnes.si
DEVELOPING FROM THE TEACHER AS THE WORKER TO THE TEACHER AS THE
INTELLECTUAL
Tanja Plevnik, Primary school Maksa Pletersnika Pisece, Slovenia,
tanja.plevnik at gmail.com
PANEL: DEBATE TECHNIQUES IN THE HISTORY CLASSROOMS
Chair: Vilma Brodnik, Institute of Education Ljubljana, Slovenia,
vilma.brodnik at zrss.si
Vesna Zinko, vesna.zinko at guest.arnes.si
Bogomir Nemec, bogomir.nemec at guest.arnes.si
Miha Gartner, mihagartner at gmail.com
Tanja Stergar, Elissa Tawitian, elissa.tawitian at guest.arnes.si
Irena Paradzik, irena.paradzik at guest.arnes.si
Violeta Gerden, violeta.gerden at guest.arnes.si
Boris Radosavljevi_, boris.radosavljevic at siol.net
DEBATE IN GERMAN CLASSROOMS – THE NEED FOR: 1. A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF
DEBATE AND ITS BENEFITS AND 2. NEW FORMATS
Anreas Felten, andreasfelten at gmx.de, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
INTRODUCING DEBATE AND DEBATE TECHNIQUES IN THE CURRICULUM AT HIGH
SCHOOL GIMNAZIJA FRANCA MIKLOSICA LJUTOMER
Mateja Godec , Gimnazija Franca Miklosica Ljutomer, Slovenia,
mateja.godec at guest.arnes.si
DEBATE AND COMPOSTION: STRANGE BEDFELLOWS?
Anne M. Canavan, anne.canavan at gmail.com, Tennessee Technological University
ENHANCING SOCIAL COMMUNICATION THROUGH DEBATE
BAKO Rozalia, Sapientia University of Transylvania Miercurea Ciuc,
Romania, rozi at ngo.ro
HORVATH Gizella, Partium Christian University Oradea, Romania,
gizusko at yahoo.com
SZABO Tunde, Transylvanian Debate Association, Romania, szabott at yahoo.com
TEACHING RHETORIC IN A PLAYFUL WAY
Michael Hoppmann, M.A. (Rhetoric and Philosophy) the University of
Tübingen Mail: michael.hoppmann at streitkultur.net
Karsten Stölzgen, M.A. (Rhetoric and Pedagogy) Freelance speech trainer
Mail: karsten.stoelzgen at streitkultur.net
RHETORIC IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOL - STIMULATING THE ARGUMENTATION
Anita Mirjanic, Primary school Gradec, Slovenia, anita.mirjanic at slo-kabel.si
THE USE OF CASUISTRY IN THE SOLVING OF TECHNICAL DILEMMAS IN HUMANITIES
AND SOCIAL STUDIES
Gregor Adlesic
RHETORIC AND DISCUSSION IN THE NEW SCHOOL SYSTEM
Bostjan Debelak, Primary school Danila Kovasica Spodnje Skofije,
Slovenia, bostjan.debelak1 at guest.arnes.si
RHETORIC IN ENGLISH LESSONS IN A THREE-YEAR VOCATIONAL PROGRAMME IN
SECONDARY EDUCATION: EXPERIENCES FROM TEACHING PRACTICE
Natasa Makovecki, High school center Velenje,
natasa.makovecki at guest.arnes.si
EXPERIENCE GAINED BY TEACHING PROFESSIONAL – THEORETICAL SUBJECTS
Irena Babic Vrecar, High school of economics, Ljubljana, Slovenia
ARGUMENTATION IN SLOVENIAN POLITICS
Boris Vezjak, vezjak at yahoo.com, University of Pedagogy, Maribor, Slovenia
LECTURES EX CATHEDRA DO NOT EXIST
Zdravko Zupancic, , School of rhetoric, Ljubljana, Slovenia,
zdravko at sola-retorike.si
PANEL: DELIBERATIVE EDUCATION
Jurate Motiejunaite, director IDEA – International Debate Education
Association, jmotiejunaite at idebate.org
Dr Nancy Claxton, curriculum developer, IDEA, nancy.claxton at gmail.com
Virginija Paksiene, director Lithuanian Debate Organisation,
virginija.paksiene at gmail.com
Katrin Viru, director Estonian Debate Organisation, viru at debate.ee
Bojana Skrt, director Za in proti, zavoda za kulturo dialoga/Pro et
contra, institute for culture of dialogue, Slovenia, bojana.skrt at siol.net
RHETORIC IN THE NEW SLOVENE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CURRICULUM
Igor Zagar, Prmorska University, Educational Research Institute
Slovenia, igor.zagar at guest.arnes.si
DEBATE SECTION
KEYNOTE: Steven Woods, Western Washington University, USA
Title to be announced, Steven.Woods at wwu.edu
SAM GREENLAND
Hong Kong - sgreenland at gmail.com
Comparative approaches to debate training
MAJA NENADOVIC
Giving Back the Voice:: Empowering Youth in Post-Conflict Areas
to Contribute to Peaceful Conflict Transformation
Fellow of the George Bell Institute - Majanenadovic at gmail.com
JAKOB STROVS
Srednja ekonomska Sola in gimnazija Trbovlje Jakob.strovs at guest.arnes.si
Student- Teacher- Debating practice in the framework of a debate club
SAM NELSON
Cornell University - Samnelson4 at aol.com
The "desportification" of debate: Stop making points, start
building arguments.
JAMES THOMAS
Cornell University – jct44 at cornell.edu
LET THE SPORT CONTINUE: response to Sam Nelson’s call to “desportify”
competitive debating
SAM NELSON, JAMES THOMAS & ADAM BARRY
Cornell University - Samnelson4 at aol.com
Debate training in prison
ANJA SERC
Faculty of social sciences, University of Ljubljana – anja_serc at yahoo.com
Interplay of rhetorical theory and discourse theory
MANOLIS POLYCHRONIDES
University of Athens - mpolychronides at yahoo.com
Testing whether debating as an extracurricular activity promotes
democratic values and skills
PRIMOZ KARNAR
ZIP-Slovenia - primoz.karnar at gmail.com
Transition from Debating in Karl Popper to British Parliamentary Debate
Format
ALAN ISAACS
Assumption University, Thailand - jedisaber108245 at yahoo.com
The study of the relationship between self-efficacy and self-esteem
among competitive debaters within the Australasian region.
ALFRED SNIDER
University of Vermont – Alfred.snider at uvm.edu
Internet debating – dissolving the tyranny of distance
SCOTT HERNDON
University of Texas at Dallas - scottaherndon at hotmail.com
The importance of arguing about political process
JERNEJA DOMAJNKO
Slovenia - jerneja.domajnko at gmail.com
Influence of debating on argumentation practice
ROK AVBAR
Faculty of arts, University of Ljubljana - rok.avbar at gmail.com
History: a modest contribution to a better world
CARL L. KELL
Western Kentucky University – carl.kell at wku.edu
The rhetoric of success – master arguments of western culture
LOKE WING FATT
SAID, Singapore - lokewf at singnet.com.sg
Assisting Inter-Tertiary Debaters
LOKE WING FATT & HEWLENS WONG
SAID, Singapore - lokewf at singnet.com.sg
Asian debate format - an evaluation
RUTH GREGSON
Lancaster University – ruth.gregson at hotmail.co.uk
Public radio debate - is it educationally democratic?
STEVEN WOODS & KORRY HARVEY
Western Washington University - Steven.Woods at wwu.edu
Valuing Value Debate
STEVEN WOODS & KORRY HARVEY
Western Washington University - Steven.Woods at wwu.edu
CASCAID: Advocacy beyond the Academy-Creating a Conference of Community
STEVEN WOODS
Western Washington University - Steven.Woods at wwu.edu
Topicality and the Social Contract: Establishing Boundaries for Meaning
or Competition?
STEVEN WOODS
Western Washington University - Steven.Woods at wwu.edu
A Defense of Dissent: A Rhetorical Examination of the Undermining of
Free Speech in Democracy
PANEL ON TEN YEARS OF SLOVENIAN DEBATE
Alfred Snider, Chair
Bojana Skrt, ZIP
Mateja Glusic Lenarcic, Gimnazija Celje Centre
Nina Cerkvenik, Gimnazja Ormoz
Anja Serc, Gimnazija Bezigrad
Edin Saracevic, Gimnazija Vic
Andreja Sut, Sredisce Ob Dravi
Dusica Dobersek, Celje
Primoz Karnar, Ljubljana University
--
Alfred C. Snider aka Tuna
Edwin Lawrence Professor of Forensics
University of Vermont
Huber House, 475 Main Street, UVM, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
Global Debate Blog http://debate.uvm.edu/debateblog/
Debate Training site http://debate.uvm.edu
World Debate Institute http://debate.uvm.edu/wdi/
GATEWAY TO ALL THINGS DEBATE http://debateoneworld.org
802-656-0097 office telephone
802-656-4275 office fax
More information about the Debate-l
mailing list